The multicenter effectiveness study of inpatient and day hospital treatment in departments of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy in Germany.

Background: Reliable outcome data of psychosomatic inpatient and day hospital treatment with a focus on psychotherapy are important to strengthen ecological validity by assessing the reality of mental health care in the field. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of inpatient and day hospital treatment in German university departments of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy in a prospective, naturalistic, multicenter design including structured assessments. Methods: Structured interviews were used to diagnose mental disorders according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV at baseline. Depression, anxiety, somatization, eating disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, as well as personality functioning were assessed by means of questionnaires on admission and at discharge. Results: 2,094 patients recruited by 19 participating university hospitals consented to participation in the study. Effect sizes for each of the outcome criteria were calculated for 4-5 sub-groups per outcome domain with differing severity at baseline. Pre-post effect sizes for patients with moderate and high symptom severity at baseline ranged from d = 0.78 to d = 3.61 with symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety showing the largest and somatization as well as personality functioning showing somewhat smaller effects. Conclusions: Inpatient and day hospital treatment in German university departments of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy is effective under field conditions. Clinical trial registration: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00016412, identifier: DRKS00016412.

[Psychosocial consequences of urinary incontinence - tabooed and undertreated: a systematic review]. / Psychosoziale Folgen der Harninkontinenz ­ tabuisiert und unterversorgt ­ eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit.

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is a significant health problem that can affect both women and men of all ages. It is not a life-threatening condition, but symptoms can have a strong impact on the physical, psychological and social well-being of those affected. Existing literature mainly reports on incontinent patients over 65 years of age. Studies about stress and effects of incontinence in younger patients are limited. Incontinence is a social taboo subject, with few sufferers seeking professional help for reasons of shame. Some incontinent individuals seek support when symptoms worsen and further reduce their quality of life. This study aims to explain which psychosocial stresses and effects of urinary incontinence in adults are described in the literature and how those affected experience these. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for the years 2007 to 2022 in the databases CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via OvidSP, PsycINFO via OvidSP and PubMed. In addition to the research in the databases, a hand search was carried out on the internet and via the reference lists of the included and critically evaluated articles. RESULTS: Incontinence affects the entire life of those affected. Incontinent patients suffer from low self-esteem and shame. They reduce physical activities, have fewer social contacts and experience problems in working life. The condition often leads to impairments in partnership and sexuality. Younger patients have a higher level of suffering than older patients. SUMMARY: In order to contribute to removing the taboo on urinary incontinence, health professionals should be made aware of the living situation of incontinent patients. Patient education is given high priority and strategies need to be developed to help those affected to cope.

[Pitfalls in communicating with patients with chronic pain in urology-from pain games to loss of authority]. / Tücken in der Kommunikation mit chronischen Schmerzpatienten in der Urologie ­ von "pain games" bis Koryphäenkillern.

Patients with chronic pain syndromes are often referred to as "difficult" patients. In addition to positive expectations of the physicians' competence, pain patients often express understandable doubts about the appropriateness and efficiency of new treatment options and are afraid of rejection and devaluation. Hope and disappointment, idealization and devaluation alternate in a characteristic way. This article demonstrates the pitfalls of communicating with patients suffering from chronic pain and provides recommendations for improving physician-patient interaction based on acceptance, honesty and empathy.

What Kind of Patients Receive Inpatient and Day-Hospital Treatment in Departments of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy in Germany?

INTRODUCTION: Germany is one of the few countries with a medical specialty of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy and many treatment resources of this kind. OBJECTIVE: This observational study describes the psychosomatic treatment programs as well as a large sample of day-hospital and inpatients in great detail using structured diagnostic interviews. METHODS: Mental disorders were diagnosed according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV by means of Mini-DIPS and SCID-II. In addition to the case records, a modified version of the CSSRI was employed to collect demographic data and service use. The PHQ-D was used to assess depression, anxiety, and somatization. RESULTS: 2,094 patients from 19 departments participated in the study after giving informed consent. The sample consisted of a high proportion of "complex patients" with high comorbidity of mental and somatic diseases, severe psychopathology, and considerable social and occupational dysfunction including more than 50 days of sick leave per year in half of the sample. The most frequent diagnoses were depression, somatoform and anxiety disorders, eating disorders, personality disorders, and somato-psychic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient and day-hospital treatment in German university departments of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy is an intensive multimodal treatment for complex patients with high comorbidity and social as well as occupational dysfunction.

Perceived distress, personality characteristics, coping strategies and psychosocial impairments in a national German multicenter cohort of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study examined differences in personality, psychological distress, and stress coping in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) depending on type of disease and disease activity. We compared patients suffering from Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) with controls. While the literature is replete with distinctive features of the pathogenesis of IBD, the specific differences in psychological impairments are not well studied. METHODS: In this German national multicenter study, participants were recruited from 32 centers. Two hundred ninety-seven questionnaires were included, delivering vast information on disease status and psychological well-being based on validated instruments with a total of 285 variables. RESULTS: CD patients were more affected by psychological impairments than patients suffering from UC or controls. Importantly, patients with active CD scored higher in neuroticism (p < 0.01), psychological distress (p < 0.001) and maladaptive stress coping (escape, p = 0.03; rumination, p < 0.03), but less need for social support (p = 0.001) than controls. In contrast, patients suffering from active UC showed psychological distress (p < 0.04) and maladaptive coping (avoidance, p < 0.03; escape, p = 0.01). Patients in remission seemed to be less affected. In particular, patients with UC in remission were not inflicted by psychological impairments. The group of CD patients in remission however, showed insecurity (p < 0.01) and paranoid ideation (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We identified specific aspects of psychological impairment in IBD depending on disease and disease activity. Our results underscore the need for psychological support and treatment particularly in active CD.

[Feasibility and effects of a psychotherapeutic group intervention for caregiving relatives of people with dementia]. / Machbarkeit und Effekte einer psychotherapeutischen Gruppenintervention für pflegende Angehörige von Menschen mit Demenz.

INTRODUCTION: Family caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) have a high burden and therefore are themselves at a high risk for psychiatric and somatic morbidities. Although individual psychotherapy has been shown to be a potentially effective treatment, it is rarely used by family caregivers. Possible reasons are poor accessibility and time restrictions on the side of the caregiver. AIM: To test the efficacy of a short-term and low threshold psychotherapeutic group intervention for family caregivers of PwD with respect to mental stability of the caregivers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from a 12-week psychotherapeutic group intervention (10 participants each in the intervention and control groups) were analyzed. Main topics of the intervention were: personal limits, dysfunctional thoughts, emotions and resource activation. Primary endpoints were an increase of perceived self-efficacy and reduction of depressive symptoms using SWE and ADS questionnaires before, directly and 3 months after the end of the intervention. RESULTS: A gain in perceived self-efficacy did not reach statistical significance, whereas depressive symptoms showed a statistically significant increase in the intervention group over time compared to the control group. DISCUSSION: The intervention did not reach its primary endpoints. Possible reasons are the fact that the group was highly heterogeneous with respect to dementia etiology and the low number of participants. The short duration of the intervention may have reduced the potential of the program to address all urgent needs of the participants.

[The Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics System (OPD-2): validity of the Axis I "Experience of illness and prerequisites for treatment"]. / Die Operationalisierte Psychodynamische Diagnostik (OPD-2): Validität der Achse I "Krankheitserleben und Behandlungsvoraussetzungen".

The Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics System (OPD) was introduced in order to allow for operationalized and reproducible psychoanalytic diagnoses. A revised version of the instrument was published in 2006. Validation studies are lacking for its Axis I, in particular. The aim of the present study is to investigate the validity of Axis I, as well as to test the underlying factors for their plausibility. The instrument was applied to 263 inpatients by trained raters. For testing their validity, OPD measures were compared to a similar self-rating questionnaire (Questionnaire of measuring the motivation for psychotherapy). These measures corresponded well, and the intercategorial differences between different patient groups (split by sex, age and ICD-10 diagnosis) according to our expectations. Moreover, we established feasible factors. Thus, our results show good validity, and a plausible internal structure of the Axis I.